Askari Defense, an Atlanta-based counter-drone startup, is building systems designed to let individual frontline soldiers detect, track, and physically stop hostile drones themselves, rather than relying on the expensive, vehicle-mounted or fixed-site air-defense installations that have traditionally handled that job. Georgia Tech’s own news office profiled the company on July 6, tracing its roots back to founder Robbie van Zyl, who was introduced to rotorcraft and autonomous systems as a high schooler spending summers in a Georgia Tech aerospace lab, and who first pitched the idea that became Askari as a first-year student through the university’s CREATE-X Startup Launch accelerator program.
The company, co-founded alongside Benjamin Airdo and Marc van Zyl, remains deeply tied to its origins: eight of Askari’s ten team members are current Georgia Tech students, recent graduates, or affiliated researchers. That academic pipeline has translated directly into real defense contracts rather than staying an interesting founder-story detail, the company is already working with US Department of War customers and has raised roughly $1.7 million in early funding, followed more recently by a $9 million seed round aimed at ramping up production to keep pace with an order book that has already crossed $2 million.
The core bet behind Askari’s product is philosophical as much as technical. Traditional counter-drone, or C-UAS, systems tend to be expensive, fixed-site installations: radar arrays, jamming equipment, and interceptor launchers built into permanent infrastructure that protects a specific base or facility but does nothing for a unit operating on the move. Askari’s hand-launched interceptors flip that model, putting a scalable, individually deployable counter-drone capability directly into the hands of a frontline operator or a small security team, closer in spirit to how shoulder-fired anti-tank weapons decentralized armor-killing capability decades ago than to the radar-and-missile-battery approach that’s defined most air defense since the Cold War.
That approach is landing at exactly the moment the Pentagon has decided counter-drone capability needs far more centralized institutional attention. The Department of War’s newly created Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager for Unmanned Systems, established in a memo signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on June 29, explicitly includes counter-unmanned systems within its consolidated authority, meaning a small startup like Askari will increasingly be interacting with a single, more empowered acquisition office rather than navigating separate, siloed relationships across different military service branches the way defense startups traditionally have.
Counter-drone technology has become one of the hottest subsectors in defense tech for reasons that are visible in real time on actual battlefields rather than in war-gaming exercises. Ukraine’s war has demonstrated at massive scale how cheap, mass-produced drones can inflict outsized damage on far more expensive conventional military hardware, and rising concern about hostile drone incursions, including incidents near US military installations and heightened activity across the Middle East, has pushed counter-drone capability from a niche specialty into a genuine near-term procurement priority across NATO and allied militaries alike. Industry trackers put global counter-UAS spending at roughly $12.6 billion in 2026 alone, with double-digit annual growth forecast through the rest of the decade, and the first three months of 2026 already produced more than $29 billion in publicly announced C-UAS contracts, headlined by a ten-year, $20 billion firm-fixed-price award the US Army gave Anduril in March. Against numbers like that, Askari’s roughly $2 million order book looks tiny, but it’s early evidence of where a much larger wave of Pentagon counter-drone spending is starting to flow: toward smaller, cheaper, more distributable systems, not only toward the handful of large prime contractors that have historically won this category outright.
That same dynamic is directly relevant to the Philippines, where the Armed Forces of the Philippines has watched, with growing concern, repeated reports of Chinese drone and vessel activity around Philippine-held features in the West Philippine Sea, and where military planners have been drawing explicit lessons from Ukraine’s drone-saturated battlefield about how a smaller, resource-constrained force can meaningfully contest a much larger opponent’s technological edge. A model built around cheap, individually deployable, hand-launched interceptors rather than expensive fixed installations is a far closer fit to what the AFP can realistically afford and actually deploy across a dispersed, island-spanning territory than the exquisite, centralized air-defense systems Western militaries have historically favored and that the Philippines has never had the budget to field at scale.
Askari’s trajectory, from a Georgia Tech student accelerator pitch to real Department of War contracts and a growing order book in roughly two years, is also worth watching as a template in its own right. It suggests a viable path for defense-tech startups doesn’t necessarily require the billion-dollar valuations and mega-rounds dominating headlines elsewhere in the sector; it can start from a university accelerator, a genuinely differentiated technical approach, and a narrow but real problem the largest contractors have been slow to address, a path that Filipino engineering talent considering the defense-tech sector, and Philippine universities weighing whether to build their own startup-accelerator infrastructure around applied engineering problems, should study closely.
Share this article