The Innovative Startup Act Committee, the interagency body responsible for administering the Philippines’ startup law, closed out 2025 with two pieces of news that together frame exactly how much work is left before Philippine Startup Week matches its own ambitions. First: the committee, at PHSW 2025 in November, reported that ₱2.1 billion in government funding has been mobilized for Philippine startups since the committee’s modern tracking began, supporting 212 startups directly and helping incubate 2,233 more through a national network of 158 technology business incubators. Second: chairmanship of the committee formally passed from the Department of Science and Technology, which had run it since the Innovative Startup Act’s implementation began, to the Department of Information and Communications Technology, which will hold the position through 2027 and has already announced that PHSW 2026 will be built around a new organizing idea entirely: aligning the event with ASEAN priorities, timed to the Philippines’ turn holding the ASEAN chairmanship in 2026.
Start with the number, because it’s the more concrete of the two announcements. ₱2.1 billion works out to roughly $36 million at current exchange rates, mobilized cumulatively across the several years DOST has chaired the ISA Committee. That’s a meaningful sum relative to the size of the Philippine startup grant ecosystem, and DOST-affiliated official Dr. Leah Buendia cited the 2,233 incubated startups and the funding total together as proof that “our national strategy is working.” It’s also, inescapably, a fraction of the headline the ISA Committee has set for itself: the committee’s own “ISA 2030 Vision” calls for the Philippines to produce four homegrown unicorns and attract $10 billion in investment by the end of the decade. ₱2.1 billion in mobilized government funding, spread across five-plus years, against a $10 billion investment target four years out, is not a trajectory that closes that gap on current pace alone; it’s a base layer of grant and incubation infrastructure that has to translate into a completely different order of magnitude of private investment to hit the stated goal.
The 158-incubator network and the expansion of tracked startup ecosystem cities, from the original Manila, Cebu, Davao, Cagayan de Oro, and Naga cluster to newly added Iloilo, Cauayan, and Solana in the Global Startup Ecosystem Index, is arguably the more durable achievement buried in that report. Building physical incubation infrastructure across eight-plus cities is slow, unglamorous work that doesn’t generate funding-round headlines, but it’s also exactly the kind of groundwork that has to exist before a founder outside Metro Manila has anywhere to go for mentorship, workspace, or a first investor introduction. Whether that infrastructure is actually producing startups that later attract real private capital, as opposed to simply existing, is the harder question the ₱2.1 billion figure doesn’t answer on its own.
The leadership handoff to DICT is the more interesting development for what it signals about strategy, not funding. DICT’s stated plan for PHSW 2026 is to lean into the Philippines’ ASEAN chairmanship year and position the event, and by extension the broader Philippine startup ecosystem, as a regional hub rather than a purely domestic showcase, under the ASEAN 2026 theme “Navigating Our Future, Together.” Concretely, that means PHSW 2026 is meant to create stronger links between Filipino startups and investors, corporations, and policymakers across the ten-member bloc, not just Filipino government officials and local VCs. It’s a reasonable strategic bet: Singapore-based funds already dominate Southeast Asian late-stage deal flow by an overwhelming margin, and a Philippine event that positions itself as a genuine ASEAN convening point, rather than a purely national trade-fair format, has a plausible path to pulling some of that regional investor attention toward Philippine-based companies specifically, rather than leaving Philippine founders to travel to Singapore or Jakarta to find it.
Whether an ASEAN-branding shift actually changes capital flows is a separate, unproven question from whether it’s a sensible thing to attempt. Regional investor attention is a scarce, contested resource that Singapore, Vietnam, and Indonesia are all also actively courting through their own flagship startup events, and a rebranded Philippine event competing for the same calendar slot on regional investors’ travel schedules doesn’t automatically win a larger share of that attention just because the Philippines happens to hold the rotating ASEAN chair for one year. What DICT’s plan does get right is diagnosing the actual problem correctly: the Philippines’ startup funding gap, as multiple ecosystem reports over the past year have converged on, isn’t primarily a shortage of Filipino entrepreneurial talent or even of domestic seed capital, it’s a shortage of the kind of late-stage, cross-border investor relationships that Singapore-based funds already have built into their default deal flow. An ASEAN-facing PHSW is at least aimed at the right target.
The test for 2026 won’t be attendance numbers or how many MOUs get signed on stage. It will be whether next year’s ISA Committee report includes a private investment figure that has actually started moving toward that $10 billion target, rather than another year of incremental growth in the grant-funded, government-mobilized number that, however real, was never going to get the ecosystem there on its own.
Share this article