The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas said this month that digital payments accounted for 64.7% of total retail transaction volume in 2025, up from 57.4% the year before. That single number matters more than it looks: it’s the first year the country has landed inside the 60%-to-70% range the central bank set as its target under the Philippine Development Plan — a target that wasn’t supposed to be hit until 2028.
The headline driver wasn’t GCash or Maya adding features. It was QR Ph, the BSP’s shared, interoperable QR standard, which processed 2.47 billion transactions worth ₱1.16 trillion in 2025 — the first year QR Ph volume overtook debit and credit card transactions in the country. Digital payment accounts grew 69.4% year-on-year, and the number of merchant locations accepting digital payments expanded 36.3%. Person-to-merchant payments made up 74.31% of total digital transaction volume, according to BSP data reported across multiple Philippine outlets this week, including BusinessWorld, GMA News, and the Manila Bulletin.
Interoperability, Not Innovation, Did the Heavy Lifting
BSP Governor Eli M. Remolona Jr. was explicit about what he thinks actually moved the number: “A lot of the growth is due to our insistence on interoperability, ensuring that a growing number of businesses and service providers are on one system,” he said, adding that this “brings in more users, which makes the network more valuable for everyone in it, including consumers, businesses, banks, e-wallets, and other platforms.” That’s a network-effects argument, not a product argument — and it’s a notable one for a regulator to make about its own market. QR Ph works the same way whether you’re scanning with GCash, Maya, a bank app, or a rural cooperative’s e-wallet, which means the standard itself — not any single app’s user experience — became the thing that compounded.
Fee Waivers Turned Out to Matter More Than Features
The second driver was blunter: money. BSP Deputy Governor Mamerto E. Tangonan, who heads the central bank’s Payments and Currency Management Sector, has pointed to the wave of banks waiving or reducing InstaPay and PESONet fund transfer fees as a direct cause of the transaction surge. The BSP had imposed a moratorium on raising those transfer fees back in 2021 specifically to push adoption; it only lifted that moratorium this year, once the shift to cashless had clearly taken hold, replacing it with Circular 1238 — a rule that ties any gap between intrabank and interbank fees strictly to the actual cost of routing a transaction through the network, a “switch cost” the BSP estimates at around ₱1.50. In other words: the regulator spent years making transfers artificially free to build habit, and only started relaxing that once the habit had visibly stuck.
Payments Are Becoming Infrastructure, Not a Product Category
For a market that was cash-dominant a decade ago, crossing 64.7% digital volume in under ten years is a genuinely fast transition — the BSP itself frames it as ahead of schedule against the 2028 target, not just on pace. But the more important structural signal for anyone building in this space is what interoperability does to the competitive map: once QR Ph works identically across every wallet and bank, “accepts digital payments” stops being a differentiator for any single platform, the same way “accepts Visa” stopped differentiating one store from another decades ago. The moat that mattered in year one of e-wallet adoption — being the app everyone already has installed — erodes once the rails underneath every app are the same rails.
There’s also a quieter policy story inside these numbers. The BSP didn’t just build QR Ph and wait; it actively suppressed the price of using it, freezing InstaPay and PESONet transfer fees for years specifically to remove friction while the habit formed. Only in 2026, once adoption had clearly crossed a threshold, did the central bank start allowing fees to move again — and even then, under Circular 1238, only by an amount tied strictly to the actual “switch cost” of routing a transaction, which it pegs at roughly ₱1.50. That’s a regulator behaving less like a rule-writer and more like a product team running a deliberate, multi-year pricing experiment on an entire national market, and it’s a large part of why the adoption curve bent as sharply as it did in 2025.
What This Means for Philippine Founders
If your startup’s pitch leans on “we make it easier to pay” in the Philippine market, this data is a warning, not a tailwind: the easy-to-pay problem is now substantially solved at the infrastructure layer, for free, by the central bank itself, and it will keep getting more solved as more institutions plug into QR Ph. That doesn’t kill payments-adjacent startups, but it does mean the real opportunity has shifted one layer up — into what you do with the transaction once it clears: underwriting credit off real-time cash-flow data, building loyalty and merchant tools on top of QR Ph rather than around it, or serving the specific segments (informal merchants, cooperatives, provincial SMEs) that the big wallets still serve poorly even at 90-plus million registered users each. The lesson from Remolona’s own framing is worth taking literally: value now accrues to whoever adds something on top of an interoperable network, not to whoever tries to rebuild the network itself. And the fee-waiver period is worth studying as a playbook in its own right — if a regulator can accelerate adoption by temporarily giving away the thing that used to be the revenue line, a founder building on top of that same rail should ask which parts of their own product are worth giving away first to get the same compounding effect.
Share this article