Two announcements in the last week of October 2026 show how unevenly the electric-vehicle transition is landing. On October 23, Volvo Cars reported a quarterly operating loss and said it would cut a further 2,500 jobs. On October 27, Reuters reported that General Motors plans hybrid versions of its best-selling three-row SUVs. Neither company is abandoning EVs, but both are visibly adjusting to a market where demand is strong in some regions and weak in others.
Volvo: a loss, deeper cuts and a cheaper EV
Volvo Cars posted an adjusted operating loss of 3.7 billion Swedish crowns for the third quarter, against a profit of 5.8 billion crowns a year earlier, according to Reuters-based reporting and autoevolution. Reuters also cites Citi analysts who had expected a loss of only 724 million crowns. Revenue fell 23 percent year on year to 66.9 billion crowns, gross margin dropped to 14.7 percent from 20.4 percent, and free cash flow was an outflow of 8.9 billion crowns, more than double the same quarter last year. Some outlets cite a different loss figure of 5.6 billion crowns, which may reflect whether adjustments are included.
The 2,500 additional job cuts, about 6 percent of the workforce and roughly 2,000 of them in Sweden, come on top of 3,000 announced earlier, for a total of 5,500 according to autoevolution. Chief executive Hakan Samuelsson said the latest round should be finished by mid-2027 but did not rule out further measures if the turnaround falls short. Volvo also plans another 5 billion crowns of savings in indirect and variable costs, on top of 23 billion crowns previously announced. Shares fell almost 30 percent on the news, Reuters reported, and are down more than two-thirds this year.
Why the quarter went wrong
Volvo points to several pressures at once. In China, revenue fell nearly 50 percent, which the company attributes to intense price competition and stronger local alternatives. In the United States, tariffs, the removal of consumer incentives for electrified vehicles and a negative revaluation of emissions credits hurt profitability. Reuters adds uneven EV demand to the list. Volvo says it will prioritize margins over market share in China and take a similar approach in the US rather than compete on price.
The picture in Europe is more encouraging. The company says demand for electric and electrified vehicles there is rising, and its EX60 electric SUV has drawn more than 50,000 European orders. The problem is supply: production is ramping more slowly than planned because of new manufacturing technology such as cell-to-body construction, which limits how many of those orders can be delivered.
The Driven reports that Volvo plans a new battery-electric model next year, initially for Europe, aimed at what the company calls a large, lower-priced segment and built on its SPA3 platform, with first deliveries due after the northern summer. Volvo is also planning 13 new cars across drivetrains by the end of the decade, and two China-market models are expected to be unveiled in mid-2027 using a Chinese technology stack and cooperation with Geely, the parent company. Samuelsson said the answer is to lower the company’s break-even point and improve cash flow.
GM: hybrids return to the plan
Reuters reported on October 27, citing people familiar with the matter and a GM statement, that GM will build hybrid versions of the Chevrolet Traverse, Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia at its Lansing Delta Township plant in Michigan. GM said it will invest in the plant to prepare for hybrid production but gave no timing or model details. CEO Mary Barra told analysts the previous week that GM would offer hybrids in multiple segments, adding that it would not require additional capital spending and engineering.
The shift is notable because executives had earlier argued that hybrids add cost and complexity and preferred to invest in EVs. Reuters links the change to rising US hybrid sales as higher gasoline prices push shoppers toward efficient vehicles, to dealer pressure, and to a slide in GM’s US market share to 16.6 percent in the first nine months from 17.4 percent a year earlier, while Toyota and Honda gained. Hybrids also did not help GM meet emissions standards that the Trump administration has since relaxed.
Funding is part of the story too. The Energy Department is restructuring an earlier award so that a $500 million grant, originally given in 2024 to retool a different Michigan plant for EVs and never released, would instead support hybrid production at Lansing. The department did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment, and the report noted that the news came just before the November 3 midterm elections.
Reading the two together
It would be too simple to say EVs are failing. Volvo’s European order book and its decision to build a cheaper battery-electric model suggest that price, not interest, is the constraint. GM’s decision suggests that in the US, where incentives have been cut and emissions rules loosened, a bridge technology is more attractive than it looked two years ago. The common theme is cost: the winners will be whoever can offer electrified vehicles at prices buyers accept while protecting margins.
A caution on evidence: both stories rely on company statements and anonymous sourcing for forward-looking plans. Neither Volvo’s new model nor GM’s hybrids have launch dates beyond the vague timing above, and plans of this kind can change.
What This Means for Philippine Founders
For founders in EV charging, fleet electrification, battery services or vehicle-data software, the lesson is to design for a mixed fleet. Hybrids and EVs will likely share roads for years, and products that only work for one drivetrain narrow the market. Pricing pressure at the vehicle level also tends to push buyers toward lower total cost of ownership, so evidence of savings, such as fuel and maintenance comparisons from real pilots, will carry more weight than general sustainability claims.
We could not confirm how either company’s changes will affect vehicle availability or pricing in the Philippines, and local founders should not assume a direct effect. A reasonable step is to monitor which brands add affordable electrified models in Southeast Asia over the next year, and to ask dealers and fleet operators what they find hardest about adoption. Those answers are better product inputs than global headlines.
Share this article